-PENDING-
IBEW Sixth District Arbitration Institute
Preparing and Presenting Arbitration Cases
November 30 - December 4, 2026
iHotel & Conference Center
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Labor Education Program
Primary Instructor - Prof. Michael H. LeRoy
Registration begins at 2:30pm Monday, November 30th and the conference ends by 1pm on Friday, December 4th.
WHO MAY ATTEND? IBEW 6th District local union officers, business representatives, chief stewards, newcomers, and individuals who have attended previous programs. Enrollment is limited, so make plans now.
Our program is designed to benefit officers and representatives at all levels—newcomers and experienced leaders. The mock cases cover (1) discipline, and (2) contract language. Our classes discuss arbitration clauses, just cause discipline, contract interpretation, researching your case, and preparing and presenting evidence at a hearing.
The highlight of the program is the assignment of an actual arbitration case to all participants, who prepare and present their cases before an actual arbitrator on the last day of the conference.
YOU WILL BE INSTRUCTED IN:
- Overview of the Grievance Process
- Evaluating and Presenting Evidence
- Understanding Contract Interpretation
- Closing Arguments/Briefs
- How to Conduct Direct and Cross Exam
- Hands-on Use of Computers to Prepare Cases
- How to Evaluate Evidence
This year’s class will feature two cases:
Discipline: A bus driver was driving normally in the far-right lane of a four-lane highway when a car, driving in the opposite direction, swerved out of control and hit the bus head-on. Video evidence clearly shows that the bus driver was not at fault and could not avoid the accident. The employer, who has a mandatory drug testing procedure for any driver who is in an accident, required a drug test for the driver. The results showed that she had marijuana in her system. She was discharged for violating the employer’s drug use policy. Under the collective bargaining agreement, was there just cause to terminate her employment?
Contract Interpretation: A sheriff department started to pay deputies overtime for a sixth consecutive day of work, and double overtime for a seventh and eighth day of work, in 1997. Contract language in 2001 defined a workweek as seven days starting on Sunday, which sometimes split accrual of time in a way that would restart a deputy’s overtime clock on Sunday during a sixth, seventh, or eighth consecutive workday (e.g., when a deputy started a work week on a Tuesday). No one on the employer and union side noticed the change until 2024, when a new HR administrator read the language and stopped paying 6th, 7th, and 8th day overtime. The union filed a grievance; the sheriff paused the system, and the matter went to arbitration. Would overtime pay be governed by clear contract language without any intent to change overtime pay; would overtime pay be determined by practice and custom; or would other contract language determine the outcome?